Sunday, November 16, 2008
Stationary solution of thought
Suppose person X acts in a certain way. Now, person Y gets to know about X’s action and interprets it in some way. Now if X understands how Y will interpret his action, then this will influence his actions. But, if Y also understands that X would know how the action will be interpreted by him, then he would interpret X’s action in a different way, under the conditioning of awareness of X. And, if this process goes on and on, we get a stationary or an equilibrium solution of thought, which decides how X will act eventually. But, if the state space is discrete, then the solution may be oscillatory. For example, suppose my brother and I have a comic book, which we both want to take to school for reading. The comic can be either in a shelf or in a bag. But, the school bus leaves in a minute, and so my brother can search for the comic at only one place. Now, if I know where the comic is and he asks me about it. Then, no matter what my answer is, the stationary solution of his interpretation will be oscillatory in nature.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I think the conclusion also depends on the assumption that X and Y are rational and can anticipate and understand each others' actions with certainty.
In real life, there are interactions between more than 2 people, not all of them are rational and not all can (or care to) understand others actions. In such a scenario, we see a multitude of behaviors, differences of opinions, and other differences that are not always reconciled.
Post a Comment